this thing has been around forever, like 2010s era. surprised its still sold. anyone running the current version. does an ea from that era even still work in todays spreads/conditions or is it a museum piece
World
Topics from outside of this forum. Views and opinions represented here may not reflect those of this forum and its members.
A world of content at your fingertips…
Think of this as your global discovery feed. It brings together interesting discussions from across the web and other communities, all in one place.
While you can browse what's trending now, the best way to use this feed is to make it your own. By creating an account, you can follow specific creators and topics to filter out the noise and see only what matters to you.
Ready to dive in? Create an account to start following others, get notified when people reply to you, and save your favorite finds.
Register Login-
backtested my EA over 3 years in the mt5 tester, 80% win rate, smooth equity curve, looked beautiful. ran it live for two months and its barely breakeven, maybe slightly down after costs.
i know some slippage is expected but this gap is huge. what are the usual culprits that make the tester lie this badly? want to figure out if the edge is fake or if im just modelling it wrong.
-
looking to consolidate to 1 broker. currently split between 3 because i kept opening accounts every time someone in a thread said theyre 'the best'.
narrowed it to tickmill pro and oanda core. spreads quoted as roughly similar on majors. tickmill commission is higher per lot but their raw feed seems cleaner in my casual testing. oanda has zero commission but spreads widen more on news.
for someone trading mostly EU/asian session, which one will save me more long term?
-
i like sharing what im doing live with a small group of trading friends, but i never want it to turn into me being treated as a signal provider, where people just copy me and blame me when it loses. how do you keep real-time sharing collaborative and educational rather than sliding into signal-selling dynamics?
-
meta question. ive seen so many promotional videos showing successful traders on the beach trading on their phone. in 5 years of actually trading, ive never seen this work for anyone i know personally. the people who try it either:
- trade really small (where stakes dont matter)
- blow up because they took shortcuts you cant take on a small screen
- give up after a few weeks and go back to desktop
am i missing something? is there a setup where phone-only trading is actually viable for serious sizes? or is it just instagram marketing?
-
most retail traders i talk to identify as either range traders or trend followers. very few say 'both equally'.
range traders cite: better win rates, clearer rules, less waiting for setups
trend followers cite: bigger winners, simpler psychology, ride the moves everyone wishes they caughtive been a trend follower for years but my P&L per opportunity has fallen as ranges dominate more in 2026. considering adding range trading approaches but worried about identity confusion / strategy dilution.
what's your primary approach and why?
-
confirmation bias might be the biggest invisible killer in trading. you find a setup, then unconsciously look only for evidence that supports it. ignore contradicting signals. enter the trade with a 'i know its right' feeling thats actually just bias dressed up as conviction.
how do you catch yourself doing this in real time? not the theoretical advice, the actual techniques that work for you.
-
ive been running pure algo for 2 years and pure manual before that. now considering a hybrid: algos handle the high frequency mechanical setups (asian session ranges, london breakouts), manual trading handles discretionary high conviction setups (news plays, technical confluences).
conceptually appealing but worried about: managing two streams of activity, capital allocation between them, mixed signals on the same instrument from algo vs my manual read.
has anyone made a hybrid setup actually work better than either pure approach?
-
serious question. fbs still doing the 100% deposit bonus. read the terms, you need like 1500 lots traded to unlock it on a 500 deposit. thats thousands in spread just to free 500 bucks. makes no sense.
has a single human here actually accepted it, hit the turnover, and pulled the money out? i wanna see proof step 3 exists
-
started getting regular payouts and realised i have no idea how to treat them for tax. is it self-employment income, a contractor payment, something else? im not asking anyone to be my accountant, just want to know how other funded traders actually categorise and handle prop payouts so i dont get a nasty surprise.
-
hit the six month mark on a consistent journal and did a full review. the gap between what i felt was happening and what the numbers showed was humbling. i felt like my big aggressive trades drove my results, the data showed my small disciplined ones did, and the aggressive ones roughly broke even after one near-disaster. sharing the recap because the feel-versus-data gap might be the most useful thing journaling taught me.
-
paid for a vps specifically so my EA would never go offline, and now the windows server on it reboots itself for updates during the trading week. came back to find the terminal closed and a position unmanaged for an hour. defeats the entire point.
how do people lock a windows vps down so it never reboots on its own during market hours?