my approach can hit the profit target in a couple of strong days, but the firm requires a minimum number of trading days. so now i have to keep trading after id normally stop, which exposes me to giving back the gains i already made. it feels like the rule punishes efficiency. is there a clean way to handle this without forcing bad trades?
World
Topics from outside of this forum. Views and opinions represented here may not reflect those of this forum and its members.
A world of content at your fingertips…
Think of this as your global discovery feed. It brings together interesting discussions from across the web and other communities, all in one place.
While you can browse what's trending now, the best way to use this feed is to make it your own. By creating an account, you can follow specific creators and topics to filter out the noise and see only what matters to you.
Ready to dive in? Create an account to start following others, get notified when people reply to you, and save your favorite finds.
Register Login-
somewhere along the way my main chart accumulated nine indicators. rsi, macd, three moving averages, bollinger, a volume thing, vwap and some oscillator i dont even remember adding. half the time they contradict each other and i freeze.
trying to decide what to actually keep. how do you experienced folks decide which indicators earn their place versus which are just comfort blankets?
-
with the same budget i could buy one large challenge or several smaller ones across firms. one big account means simpler management and bigger payouts per win. several small ones spread the risk if a firm collapses or i breach a rule on one. for those running funded accounts, which structure actually works better in practice?
-
ive got one decent mechanical system working and im debating whether to deepen it or build a second, uncorrelated one to smooth the equity curve. diversification across systems sounds smart but it also doubles the maintenance and the ways things can go wrong. for systematic traders, is multiple uncorrelated systems genuinely better, or is one well-understood system the wiser path?
-
lots of brokers advertise negative balance protection so you cant lose more than you deposit. sounds reassuring but i wonder how it actually behaves in a real flash crash or gap, like the swiss franc event years ago. is it a solid guarantee or marketing that quietly has exceptions in the fine print?
-
i have a full time job and can give maybe one to two focused hours in the evening plus weekends. is that enough to actually get somewhere as a beginner, or is trading one of those things where if you cant stare at charts all day you shouldnt bother? trying to set realistic expectations before i commit.
-
i like trading breakouts but the false ones are killing me, price breaks the level, i enter, then it snaps right back and stops me out. the real breakouts pay well but the fakeouts bleed me between them. how do experienced breakout traders filter out the false ones, or is a certain failure rate just the cost of the style?
-
the last couple of weeks have felt lifeless on my watchlist, tight ranges, no follow-through, setups that fizzle. cant tell if its a genuinely low-volatility period across the board or just the specific pairs im watching being quiet. what are others seeing, and how do you adjust when the market genuinely goes quiet for a stretch?
-
mt5 ecosystem has thousands of indicators and EAs available in the codebase, mostly junk. but theres a small set of genuinely useful free plugins that consistently come up in serious trading conversations.
curious what people actually have installed and use daily. specifically interested in:
- chart annotation tools
- statistical analysis indicators
- economic calendar integration
- trade journaling extensions
share your top 3 must-haves.
-
signed up and now the broker is asking for a passport scan and a proof of address before i can withdraw. as a beginner this feels uncomfortable, sending my identity documents to a company online. is this normal and safe, or a red flag i should worry about?
to settle it: do the kyc, its mandatory and normal, but verify the broker is properly regulated first since thats the part that actually protects your documents. some traders also watermark their uploaded id with the date and purpose, for example 'for broker verification only', which is a small extra safeguard against the file being reused. then upload through the official portal and move on. -
during the 15 mins around london close (17:00 UTC ish) spreads always widen. thats expected, lower liquidity zone.
but ive noticed across 4 brokers a HUGE range in how badly they widen. one of my brokers shows 1.5 pip EURUSD spread that normally trades at 0.3. another shows 3-4 pips on the same instrument at the same minute.
is this just normal broker variation or are some brokers using the liquidity dip as cover for extra markup? curious if anyone has measured this systematically.
-
the discussion around vps usually defaults to 'yes you need one' but the real answer depends on what you do. for discretionary swing traders sitting on a desktop with stable internet, do you really need a vps? the costs add up ($20-50/month for decent specs).
curious where people draw the line:
- pure swing/position trader, opens position, walks away for days: vps overkill?
- intraday discretionary trader at home: marginally useful?
- algo trader 24/7 strategies: clearly necessary?
what's your setup?
-
trading on a single 27 inch monitor for 2 years. constantly alt-tabbing between tradingview, mt5, news feed, and a python notebook for journaling. considering upgrading to dual monitor setup.
for those who made the jump to dual monitors: did your trading actually improve or just your comfort? specifically interested in whether the productivity boost translated to better decisions or just less friction.