Forum Forexroasted

had small accs on both. spreads similar, xm terminal felt snappier, fxtm support replied faster. both routed me offshore cause im not eu. skip the bonus on either

one small payout from a firm with no track record tells you almost nothing. the firms that later vanish also pay the early small withdrawals, thats how they build the trust they later cash in. one clean payout is the bait phase, not the verdict.

nine indicators is just nine different ways to rationalise a trade you already emotionally decided to take. deleting them wont fix that, itll just make the bias quieter and harder to notice.

had a stop on gbpjpy, price wicked down 30 pips hit my stop then instantly went back up. checked tradingview and 2 other brokers feeds, the spike wasnt there. only my brokers chart had it. is this a thing or am i being paranoid

mostly true. the tell is, do they rank a broker high that pays no affiliate commission. almost none do. the ranking is literally sorted by payout and then reverse-justified with words. follow the money

ICT silver bullet is the gourmet name for 'trade the london and ny open with confluence'. classical traders did this for 30 years before someone made it sound mystical.

doesnt feel like mine is also exactly what people say right before they abandon a perfectly good strategy because following rules is boring and they crave the dopamine of discretion. sometimes the discomfort isnt misfit, its just the unglamorous feeling of disciplined trading, which never feels exciting.

current balance, recalculated each trade. so as you grow you risk more in dollars but same %, as you lose you risk less in dollars. it auto-shrinks your size during a losing streak which is exactly what saves you

any edge that fits on a marketing landing page and gets sold to thousands of retail traders is by definition not an edge anymore. real edges are boring, hard to explain, and not for sale as a monthly subscription. the slickness of the marketing is inversely proportional to the reality of the edge.

youve already entered and youre asking us to poke holes, which means youll ignore any hole that suggests closing. this isnt accountability, its seeking an audience for a decision you made. the only honest version is posting the result, not the rationale.

wyckoff died in 1934 and his methods were developed for stocks with genuine floor-based specialists creating the patterns. applying it to decentralized modern forex with algorithmic market makers is technically a category error. useful concepts, wrong context.

serious size in retail forex usually means someone went from 0.1 to 1 lot and now thinks theyre moving markets. unless youre trading dozens of lots the liquidity is fine and youre overthinking it to feel professional.

every one of these threads fills up with 'i got funded and paid' from people who then quietly fail their next account and never update. survivorship in real time. the honest version includes everyone who paid a fee, failed, and learned nothing, which is most of the volume and never posts.

day one and already worried about which broker. the broker is not what will take your money in the first year, your own overtrading is. but sure, pick a regulated one so at least the right entity holds the funds youre about to misuse.

if the firm pays out from challenge fees rather than real market profits, youre in a zero-sum game against the other applicants with the house taking a rake. dressing that up as 'access to capital' is marketing. some are funded by real trading, most are funded by the next batch of hopefuls.

been on axiory for 11 months. execution is actually solid, on par with my pepperstone account. 4 withdrawals processed, none over 3 business days. but i wouldnt put my main capital there. belize regulation means if they decide not to pay you have very limited recourse.