lqdfx funded program, current experience
-
lqdfx has been around for a while but ive only recently considered them seriously. their offering is more niche than the bigger props - smaller account sizes available (good for first try), focus on certain types of strategies (swing-friendly rules).
for anyone running their funded program currently: how have the last 6 months been? payouts on time? any sneaky rule changes?
-
-
smaller eval = smaller fee (typically $50 for $10k vs $400 for $100k), same percentage profit targets and DD rules but on smaller absolute dollar amounts. failing a $10k eval costs less. passing means your funded account is smaller so your earnings per cycle are smaller. for testing your strategy, smaller is wiser. for maximizing income, larger makes sense once you trust your edge.
-
lqdfx specifically is good for swing traders. their DD rules are less aggressive on weekend gap risk than ftmo, which is a meaningful difference if you hold positions through fridays. nice fit for that style.
-
lqdfx, ftmo, alphacapital, blueguardian. they're all the same business model with different paint. pick whichever has the cheapest eval fee for what youer willing to risk.
-
the business models are similar but the rule sets are meaningfully different in ways that affect different trader profiles. someone whose strategy makes 8% in 2 weeks fails ftmo (consistency rule) but passes alpha. someone who holds weekend trades passes lqdfx but breaches ftmo. its not just paint.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better š
register login