<![CDATA[lqdfx funded program, current experience]]>lqdfx has been around for a while but ive only recently considered them seriously. their offering is more niche than the bigger props - smaller account sizes available (good for first try), focus on certain types of strategies (swing-friendly rules).

for anyone running their funded program currently: how have the last 6 months been? payouts on time? any sneaky rule changes?

]]>https://forum.forexroasted.com/topic/244/lqdfx-funded-program-current-experienceRSS for NodeSat, 06 Jun 2026 00:38:55 GMTMon, 02 Feb 2026 13:18:00 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to lqdfx funded program, current experience on Wed, 04 Feb 2026 14:50:00 GMT]]>lqdfx for swing style.

]]>https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/781https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/781Wed, 04 Feb 2026 14:50:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to lqdfx funded program, current experience on Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:36:19 GMT]]>the business models are similar but the rule sets are meaningfully different in ways that affect different trader profiles. someone whose strategy makes 8% in 2 weeks fails ftmo (consistency rule) but passes alpha. someone who holds weekend trades passes lqdfx but breaches ftmo. its not just paint.

]]>https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/780https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/780Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:36:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to lqdfx funded program, current experience on Tue, 03 Feb 2026 16:45:00 GMT]]>lqdfx, ftmo, alphacapital, blueguardian. they're all the same business model with different paint. pick whichever has the cheapest eval fee for what youre willing to risk.

]]>https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/779https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/779Tue, 03 Feb 2026 16:45:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to lqdfx funded program, current experience on Tue, 03 Feb 2026 12:18:00 GMT]]>lqdfx specifically is good for swing traders. their DD rules are less aggressive on weekend gap risk than ftmo, which is a meaningful difference if you hold positions through fridays. nice fit for that style.

]]>https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/778https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/778Tue, 03 Feb 2026 12:18:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to lqdfx funded program, current experience on Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:36:21 GMT]]>smaller eval = smaller fee (typically $50 for $10k vs $400 for $100k), same percentage profit targets and DD rules but on smaller absolute dollar amounts. failing a $10k eval costs less. passing means your funded account is smaller so your earnings per cycle are smaller. for testing your strategy, smaller is wiser. for maximizing income, larger makes sense once you trust your edge.

]]>https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/777https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/777Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:36:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to lqdfx funded program, current experience on Mon, 02 Feb 2026 18:50:00 GMT]]>whats the difference between starting with $10k eval vs $100k eval? more risk to fail?

]]>https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/776https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/776Mon, 02 Feb 2026 18:50:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to lqdfx funded program, current experience on Mon, 02 Feb 2026 16:22:00 GMT]]>+1. lqdfx is one of the underrated props. less visible than ftmo and the bigger names but their actual operation is consistent. their smaller eval sizes ($10k, $25k) are great for testing strategies without committing to a $100k+ eval fee.

]]>https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/775https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/775Mon, 02 Feb 2026 16:22:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to lqdfx funded program, current experience on Mon, 02 Feb 2026 14:55:00 GMT]]>funded with lqdfx for 9 months. 6 payouts received, all within their stated 5 business day window. rules havent changed since i started. their dashboard isnt as polished as the bigger props but its functional. solid mid-tier choice.

]]>https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/774https://forum.forexroasted.com/post/774Mon, 02 Feb 2026 14:55:00 GMT