skip-to-content
  • header.categories
  • 0 header.unread 0
  • header.recent
  • header.popular
  • header.world
collapse
Forum ForexRoasted Logo

Forum Forexroasted

  1. ForexRoasted Community
  2. header.categories
  3. Prop Firms
  4. Prop Firm Discussion
  5. anyone actually completed a full payout cycle with fundednext lately

anyone actually completed a full payout cycle with fundednext lately

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Prop Firm Discussion
7 posts 7 posters 159 views 7 watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ArthurA offline
    ArthurA offline
    Arthur
    wrote on global:last-edited-by, Admin
    #1

    considering fundednext and the marketing looks fine, but marketing always looks fine. what i want is people who have actually completed a full cycle recently: passed, traded funded, requested a withdrawal and received it. how long did the payout take, any friction, any rule surprises along the way? recent experiences only please, things change fast in this space.

    one trade at a time

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C offline
      C offline
      carterw
      wrote on global:last-edited-by,
      #2

      completed a cycle a couple of months back. passed the evaluation, traded the funded account, requested a payout once i cleared the minimum holding period, and it arrived within the stated window without drama. one thing to know going in: mind the consistency-style expectations so a single huge day doesnt complicate your first payout. no surprises beyond what was documented. for me it was a clean cycle.

      Risk first.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D offline
        D offline
        derekwhite
        wrote on global:last-edited-by,
        #3

        matches what ive seen reported recently in trader communities, clean payouts when people followed the rules, friction mostly when someone tripped a consistency or minimum-days condition and read it as the firm stalling. read those specific rules before your first payout request and most of the horror-story scenarios just dont apply to you.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • frostbyteF offline
          frostbyteF offline
          frostbyte
          wrote on global:last-edited-by,
          #4

          asking for 'recent experiences only' is smart because in this industry a firms behaviour six months ago tells you little about today. but also remember the people posting clean cycles are the ones who passed. youre sampling winners by definition. the failed majority who never reached a payout dont answer payout-experience threads.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • DeanD offline
            DeanD offline
            Dean
            wrote on global:last-edited-by,
            #5

            the survivorship caveat is valid and worth holding. that said, payout-experience threads do still answer the specific question that matters, does the firm pay people who reach the payout stage. whether you personally reach that stage is about your trading. the thread can confirm the firm pays the finishers, it cant tell you youll be one. keep those two separate.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • lowkeysamL offline
              lowkeysamL offline
              lowkeysam
              wrote on global:last-edited-by,
              #6

              clean recent cycle here too, read the consistency rule first.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J offline
                J offline
                jack_online
                wrote on global:last-edited-by,
                #7

                to make your own check stronger, dont rely only on this thread. cross-reference with unsolicited recent payout posts in a couple of independent communities and look for a consistent recent pattern rather than a single glowing or damning report. one clean cycle is a data point, a steady stream of recent clean cycles from unrelated traders is evidence.

                check the details

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • AdminA Admin moved this topic from Prop Firm Reviews on

                Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                register login
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • login

                • dont-have-account register

                • login-register-to-search
                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • header.categories
                • header.unread 0
                • header.recent
                • header.popular
                • header.world